“民意”进入司法判决的基本依据——基于法哲学、法理学和司法解释视角

从哲学视角看，人类认知能力的局限性决定了制定法的滞后性和不完整性。不确定概念和一般性条款正是克服制定法此类病灶的重要途径。立法者通过不确定概念和一般性条款将民意引入司法判决，克服制定法的局限性。从法理学视角看，立法者之所以设定不确定概念和一般性条款，就是要赋予法官自由裁量权，让法官依个案的具体情况引入民意，充实甚至变更制定法的内容。从价值补充的视角看，不确定概念和一般性条款的价值补充也与民意难以割舍。因此，不确定概念和一般性条款是民意进入司法的合法路径。

On value of public opinion--From the perspective of legal philosophus, juris prudence and legal interpretation

From the perspective of legal philosophy, human cognitive ability is limited to decide that the defects of statutes are difficult to avoid. Uncertain concepts and general terms are the important ways to overcome the defects. The legislators make public opinion into judicial decisions through uncertain concepts and general terms, to overcome the limitations of statutes. From the perspective of jurisprudence, legislators have given the discretion to the judges with uncertain concepts and general terms, so the judges can introduce the public opinion to enrich, and even change the contents of law in accordance with the specific conditions of cases. From legal interpretation, uncertain concepts and general terms have to depend on public opinion value adding. Therefore, uncertain concepts and general terms are the legal paths of public opinion into the justice.