首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

关于完善不作为行政违法司法救济的思考
引用本文:毕可志. 关于完善不作为行政违法司法救济的思考[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2002, 15(2): 174-179
作者姓名:毕可志
作者单位:烟台大学法学院,山东,烟台,264005
摘    要:为了对不作为行政违法实施充分有效的救济 ,应扩大对不作为行政违法的司法救济范围 ,将损害公共利益的不作为行为、抽象的不作为行为和损害相对人权利的各项具体不作为行为 ,都纳入司法救济 ;同时应将行政内救济优先、司法救济最终、救济机构地位独立、社会干预、检察机关主动介入等原则 ,确立为对不作为行政违法的司法救济原则 ,并且 ,确定对不作为行政违法的司法救济方式应该是 :宣告不作为行为是行政违法、责令行政机关限期履行行政行为、责令行政机关赔偿损失、追究直接责任人员的法律责任。

关 键 词:不作为  行政违法  司法救济
文章编号:1002-3194(2002)02-0174-06
修稿时间:2001-04-03

Reflections on the Perfection of Judicial Remedy of the Omission of Administration
BI Ke-zhi. Reflections on the Perfection of Judicial Remedy of the Omission of Administration[J]. Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2002, 15(2): 174-179
Authors:BI Ke-zhi
Abstract:To provide sufficient and effective remedies for illegal administrative nonfeasance, we should enlarge judicial remedy scope, taking nonfeasance which causes damage to public interests, abstract nonfeasance, and every concrete nonfeasance which brings harm to the party concerned into judicial remedy scope. At the same time, we need to establish principles such as administrative remedy comes first, judicial remedy comes last, remedy organizations are free from social intervention, procuratorial organizations involve themselves whenever they feel it is necessary. Judicial remedies for illegal administrative nonfeasance should declare that nonfeasance is the violation of administrative law; charge the administration to perform its obligation within fixed time and compensate for the loss, punish persons directly responsible for the nonfeasance according to law.
Keywords:Omission  violation of administration  judicial remedy
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号