首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

司法公开中的裁量及其统制
引用本文:史全增. 司法公开中的裁量及其统制[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 9(1): 20-25. DOI: 10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2016.01.04
作者姓名:史全增
作者单位:中国人民公安大学 警务实战训练部, 北京 100038
摘    要:当前,我国的司法公开实践中存在着诸多问题,需要对司法公开裁量理论展开系统的研究。同行政裁量不同,司法公开裁量具有主体的特定性、监督的匮乏性、范围的法定性等特点,并受到经济社会发展状况、法律规范状况、法官职业素养和公民权利意识等因素的影响。在司法公开裁量中,法官既要注重程序上的良好公开,也要注重裁判中的释法说理工作。为了促进司法公开裁量权的良好行使,还应当从立法的统制、法院的自我规制和社会统制等方面建构合理的统制体系。

关 键 词:司法公开  裁量  形式公开  程序公开  实质公开  统制  

Discretion and control in open judiciary
SHI Quan-zeng. Discretion and control in open judiciary[J]. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology(Social Science Edition), 2016, 9(1): 20-25. DOI: 10.7688/j.issn.1674-0823.2016.01.04
Authors:SHI Quan-zeng
Affiliation:Policing Training Department, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China
Abstract:Currently, there are many problems in the practice of open judiciary in China. The systematic research is needed on the theory of judicial discretion. Being different from administrative discretion, judicial discretion has the characteristics such as the specific subject, the insufficient supervision, and the statutory scope. And judicial discretion is affected by the factors such as economic and social development, legal norms, judge’s professional quality, and right consciousness of citizens. In the open judicial discretion, judges should not only focus on the good publicity of procedure, but also pay attention to the interpretation and reasoning work in judgments. In order to promote the good exercise of judicial openness discretion, reasonable control system should be built from the aspect of legislative control, self-regulation and social control of legislation.
Keywords:open judiciary  discretion  form openness  procedure openness  substance openness  control  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号