| 考茨基和卢森堡对伯恩施坦"适应论"批驳的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 唐美丽,张保和.考茨基和卢森堡对伯恩施坦"适应论"批驳的比较研究[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,42(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 唐美丽 张保和 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南京信息工程大学,公共管理学院,江苏,南京,210044;南京师范大学,公共管理学院,江苏,南京,210046
2. 南京师范大学,公共管理学院,江苏,南京,210046;井冈山大学,政法学院,江西,吉安,343009 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金，江西省高校教改项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 伯恩施坦以资本主义"经济发展中的新材料"为借口,声称垄断组织和信用制度一样可以调节生产和流通,消除经济危机的产生;中小企业的广泛存在,以及它们表现出的"适应性"和"顽强性",完全有能力和大企业竞争、并存等言论,遭到了考茨基、卢森堡等马克思主义理论家的批驳.考茨基和卢森堡对伯恩施坦资本主义"适应论"的批驳有相同的视角,但态度、方法和侧重点却有差别,这对采取什么样的态度和原则去对待马克思主义以及对研究当代资本主义新现象、新趋势都是很有启示意义的.
|
| 关 键 词： | 卢森堡 考茨基 伯恩施坦 适应论 马克思主义 资本主义 |
Comparative Study on Kautsky and Luxembourg to Bernstein's "Adaptation Theory" |
| |
| TANG Mei-li,ZHANG Bao-he.Comparative Study on Kautsky and Luxembourg to Bernstein's "Adaptation Theory"[J].Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2011,42(1). |
| |
| Authors: | TANG Mei-li ZHANG Bao-he |
| |
| Institution: | TANG Mei-li1,2,ZHANG Bao-he2,3(1.School of Public Management,Nanjing University of Information Sci.& Tech,Nanjing 210044,China,2.School of Public Management,Nanjing Normal University,Nanjing 210046,3.School of Political Science and Law,Jinggangshan University,Ji'an,Jiangxi 343009,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Bernstein took the capitalism new material in the economic development as an excuse and declared that the Monopolistic organization and the credit system may adjust equally production and circulation and may eliminate economic crisis.In his eyes,the small and medium-sized enterprises displayed the tenacious compatibility and had the ability to compete and co-exist with the big enterprises.Due to Bernstein's opinion,his capitalism adaptation theory,Marxist theoretician's Kautsky and Luxembourg repudiated vio... |
| |
| Keywords: | Luxembourg Kautsky Bernstein adaptation theory Marxism capitalism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
