首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

审计诚信的基石:制度选择
引用本文:谢志华.审计诚信的基石:制度选择[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2006,21(1):65-69.
作者姓名:谢志华
作者单位:北京工商大学,北京,100037
基金项目:北京市哲学社会科学基金,北京市教委社会科学基金
摘    要:审计诚信是两权分离的公司制企业有效运转的前提,但是,审计作假有其必然性。如果不能有效地对审计作假进行控制,企业制度就很难顺利变迁。要使审计作假得以有效控制,必须要使作假者承担作假成本。作假成本包括五个方面:个人信誉损失、职业信誉损失、经济赔偿、行政处分和刑事处罚,要使这五个方面对作假人发挥控制效力,必须要建立一套有效的制度。

关 键 词:审计诚信  制度选择  运行框架  审计作假
文章编号:1009-6116(2006)01-65-05
收稿时间:2005-12-08
修稿时间:2005年12月8日

The Foundation Stone for Auditing in Good Faith: Institutional Choice
Xie Zhihua.The Foundation Stone for Auditing in Good Faith: Institutional Choice[J].Journal of Beijing Technology and Business University:Social Science,2006,21(1):65-69.
Authors:Xie Zhihua
Institution:School of Accounting, Beijing Technology & Business University, Beijing 100037
Abstract:Auditing in good faith is a precondition of effective operation for corporate enterprises in which the ownership and managerial power are separated. However, there is inevitability in audit fraud. If audit fraud cannot be restrained effectively, hardly can the corporate system be transformed in a smooth way. In order to effectively hold back audit fraud, it is necessary to make the cheater bear the cheating cost, which includes such five aspects as the loss in personal credit standing, the loss in career credit standing, economic indemnity, administrative punishment and criminal punishment. To wield the power of such five aspects to restrain the cheaters from cheating, it is necessary to establish a set of effective institutions
Keywords:auditing in good faith  institutional choice  operating framework  audit fraud (false auditing)  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京工商大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号