清晰论证:G.A.柯亨的非劳动价值论的剥削论证何以可能

G．A．柯亨认为在马克思的著作中，劳动价值论存在两种表述方式，其通俗表述是“劳动且只有劳动创造价值”，而其严格表述是“社会必要劳动时间决定价值”。柯亨论证说依据严格表述，通俗表述是错误的；而依据价值的约定定义，严格表述也是错误的。所以，柯亨认为以劳动价值论为基础的剥削论证是不成功的，他提出了以“只有工人生产了拥有价值的产品”为基础的清晰论证来代替劳动价值论的剥削论证。柯亨的这个新论证也存在问题，所以后来柯亨的剥削批判是以“自我所有”为论说对象的。

Plain Argument:How Did G.A.Cohen Demonstrates Exploitation

G.A.Cohen thinks there are two ways of expressing about the labor theory of value in Marx’s works:the popu-lar doctrine is “labor and labor alone creates value”;the strict doctrine is “socially necessary labor time determines val-ue”.Cohen argues that according to the strict doctrine,the popular doctrine is wrong,and according to simulative defini-tion of value,the strict doctrine is wrong.So Cohen argues that Marx’s demonstration on the basis of the labor theory of value is unsuccessful.Cohen puts forward a new demonstration named “The Plain Argument”as an alternative.I argue that “The Plain Argument”is also not perfect.