首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论沉默权的现实性
引用本文:韩金山. 论沉默权的现实性[J]. 新疆大学学报(社会科学版), 2006, 34(6): 56-59
作者姓名:韩金山
作者单位:新疆大学法学院 新疆乌鲁木齐830047
摘    要:沉默权符合自然权利,是对抗制诉讼模式的要求,我国确立沉默权是促进刑事诉讼民主与公正、保障犯罪嫌疑人人格尊严和合法权益,提高办案效率和科学办案能力的需要。具体实施上应设置沉默权告知程序、限制讯问时间、保障在押嫌疑人的会见权和通讯权等,同时应明确讯问时的律师在场权利,修订审判阶段的讯问被告人程序。

关 键 词:沉默权  自我归罪特权  刑事诉讼民主与公正  现实性
文章编号:1000-2820(2006)06-0056-04
修稿时间:2006-03-09

On the Right to Silence
HAN Jin-shan. On the Right to Silence[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University, 2006, 34(6): 56-59
Authors:HAN Jin-shan
Abstract:The right to silence accords to natural law and is a requirement against suiting mode.To guarantee the right to silence in China is to promote the democracy and just of criminal suits,to protect suspects' personality and lawful rights,to meet the demands on the ability to effectively handle cases.In reality,there should be procedures to notify the right to silence,to limit the time of interrogating,to guarantee the suspects' right to presence and communications,to ascertain the right to presence of the lawyer while the suspect is interrogated,and to revise the procedures of trying the suspect.
Keywords:right to silence  privilege of self-guilt  democracy and just of criminal suits  reality
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号