| 我国共犯模式的合理选择——以区分制和单一制的价值评判为视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王太宁,王君伟. 我国共犯模式的合理选择——以区分制和单一制的价值评判为视角[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 0(2): 38-43 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王太宁 王君伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 昆明理工大学法学院;吉林大学法学院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目“定罪思维的当代转变及其影响”(09BFX084) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以限缩正犯概念为基础建构的区分制是罪刑法定原则的体现,以扩张正犯概念为理论基础的单一制却更好地贯彻了规范主义的立场和责任原则、罪刑均衡原则。我国古代的共犯立法既缺乏罪刑法定的理念,也缺乏罪责刑个别化的理念,现有的共犯模式确立之时也没有基于维护构成要件定型性、贯彻罪刑法定的考量。从我国共犯的历史传统、共犯确立的立法进程考察,及从现行共犯模式的立法规范特征分析,主张我国共犯模式归属于区分制的观点没有法律上的依据,相反却具有单一制的某些特征。因为单一制可以兼顾罪刑法定和罪责均衡,而区分制为实现追求罪责均衡的努力不但带来理论体系内部的复杂和矛盾,而且已然偏离了罪刑法定,所以我国共犯模式应采用单一制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 共犯 区分制 单一制 |
The Rational Choice for Complicity System: From the Perspective of Value-judging for Differenzierungs System and Einheits System |
| |
| WANG Tai-ning,WANG Jun-wei. The Rational Choice for Complicity System: From the Perspective of Value-judging for Differenzierungs System and Einheits System[J]. Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences), 2011, 0(2): 38-43 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Tai-ning WANG Jun-wei |
| |
| Affiliation: | WANG Tai-ning1,WANG Jun-wei2(1.Law School,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming,Yunnan,650500,China,2.Law School,Jilin University,Changchun,Jilin,130012,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Differenzierungs System,which based on the hindered principal concept,reflecting the principle of a legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime.And Einheits System,which based on the expanded principal concept,implementing the principles of paternalism,obligation principle and principle of balance between a crime and a punishment.The legislation for complicity in ancient China neither has the ideology of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime,and nor ideology of individuation for crimes... |
| |
| Keywords: | complicity differenzierungs system einheits system |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
