Police bargaining,arbitration, and fringe benefits |
| |
Authors: | Peter Feuille John Thomas Delaney Wallace Hendricks |
| |
Institution: | (1) University of Illinois, 61820 Champaign, IL;(2) Columbia University, 10027 New York, NY;(3) University of Illinois, 61820 Champaign, IL |
| |
Abstract: | Data from a national sample of 500 to 600 U.S. cities with over 25,000 in population indicated that the practice of police
collective bargaining has a positive, strong association with fringe benefits (measured by city contributions for police retirement
and insurance benefits per police officer). The availability of arbitration, however, seems to have little or no influence
on the dollar amount of police fringes, and neither the current nor the prior use of arbitration (i.e., actually receiving
an arbitration award) has any consistent association with police fringes. The results indicate that collective bargaining
and regional location influence the level of police fringes more than do other variables.
We are grateful to Steve Kawakami, Mark Phillips, Joe Schimansky, and Dick Williams for some excellent research assistance.
We are also grateful to the National Institute of Justice of the U.S. Department of Justice for financially supporting this
research. Such support does not mean that the Institute or Department necessarily agrees with our methods or conclusions. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|