首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

明示交际与旁敲侧击式交际的比较
引用本文:杜福兴.明示交际与旁敲侧击式交际的比较[J].汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版),2007,23(3):52-55.
作者姓名:杜福兴
作者单位:广东深圳职业技术学院应用外国语学院,广东,深圳,518055
摘    要:明示交际理解与普通认知理解实质上都是寻找关联,但它们体现的关联量是不同的。明示交际的过程包括了语码识别、溯因、演绎推理和用关联期待检验,而旁敲侧击式交际的过程只有语码识别、溯因、演绎推理,结果旁敲侧击式交际比明示交际更容易产生误解。

关 键 词:明示交际  旁敲侧击式交际  溯因  关联期待
文章编号:1001-4225(2007)03-0052-004
修稿时间:2006年10月25

A Comparison Between Ostensive Communication and Beating-about-the-bush Communication
DU Fu-xing.A Comparison Between Ostensive Communication and Beating-about-the-bush Communication[J].Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition),2007,23(3):52-55.
Authors:DU Fu-xing
Abstract:This article focuses on the different characteristics of both ostensive communication and beating-about-the-bush communication. The nature of understanding in ostensive communication and that of cognition are the same --- to find relevance, but they are different when it comes to the degree of relevance. The process of ostensive communication includes decoding, abduction, deduction and checking up with the criterion of expectation of relevance, while that of beating-about-the-bush communication only includes decoding, abduction, and deduction. As a result, misunderstanding can more easily arise in the latter than in the former.
Keywords:ostensive communication  beating-about-the-bush communication  abduction  expectation of relevance
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号