Relationships Between Candidate Self-Monitoring, Perceived Personality, and Selection Interview Outcomes |
| |
Authors: | Neil Anderson Jo Silvester Nicole Cunningham-Snell Emma Haddleton |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths College, University of London, New Cross, SE14 6NW, London, England;(2) Department of Psychology, City University, Blackfriars, London, England;(3) Goldsmiths College, University of London, England;(4) Department of Psychology, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, Wales |
| |
Abstract: | A study into the relationships between candidateself-monitoring ability, interviewer perceptions ofcandidate personality, and interviewer outcome decisionsin the context of actual graduate recruitment interviews (n = 130) is presented. Detailedpsychometric norm data is also reported on the Lennoxand Wolfe (1984) revised Self-Monitoring (RS-M) scale,together with the results of confirmatory factoranalyses into the factor structure of this measure. Itwas found that candidate self-monitoring ability wasonly moderately and nonsignificantly related tointerviewer outcome evaluations, and thatself-monitoring was generally uncorrelated with thepositiveness of recruiter impressions of candidatepersonality. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed thata two correlated factor structure for the RS-M scale, inaccordance with the original authors' formulation,provided the most parsimonious fit. Norm data for theRS-M scale is reported for this sample of Britishgraduates, including item statistics, item to subscale,item to scale correlations, and internal reliabilitycoefficients. Implications for future research intocandidate impression management, self-monitoring,interviewer decision making, and the practicalimplications arising from these findings arediscussed. |
| |
Keywords: | SELECTION INTERVIEWS SELF-MONITORING PERSONALITY |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|