首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


An examination of the disparity between self-identified versus legally identified rape victimization: A pilot study
Authors:Dorothy F. Marsil  Corinne McNamara
Affiliation:1. Department of Psychology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USAdmarsil@kennesaw.edu;3. Department of Psychology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, USA
Abstract:ABSTRACT

Objective: Researchers compared rape victimization based on self-identification to the current federal legal definition in a pilot study of college students. Methods: The sample was comprised of 1,648 (69.8% female; 30.2% male) college students who completed the Sexual Experiences Survey—Short Form Victimization (SES-SFV) online. Results: Based on the current legal definition of rape, 9.4% (11.1% female; 5.2% male) of students had been raped since being enrolled, but only 2.9% of students self-identified as being raped. Moreover, 15.1% of students reported ever being raped, with females acknowledging higher rates (19.7%) than males (4.3%). Conclusions: Rape continues to be a major issue for colleges and universities. A serious concern is the disparity between the number of those who met the behavioral criteria for rape victimization based on the current legal definition, but who did not self-identify as a victim. Universities must address this disparity by using multiple measures to assess the prevalence of sexual violence on campus.
Keywords:College students  gender  rape  sexual assault
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号