论苏氏蜀学与洛学的歧异

苏氏蜀学与洛学的歧异主要表现在两个方面:一、“人情”说。程颐认为性善情恶,提出“主敬”说,强调对情的压抑与束缚;而苏轼等则认为情性合一,并无善恶之别,强调尊重、顺应人情,反对外在束缚。二、道统说及文道关系观。洛学重道轻文,甚至认为“作文害道”;苏氏蜀学则主张文与道俱,文道并重。基于这一认识,两派学者各自提出了自己的道德传承谱系,以儒家正统相标榜。苏氏蜀学与洛学的歧异,反映了两派学术的不同旨趣及确立自身在儒学中正统地位的努力。

ON THE ACADEMIC DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SU'S SHU SCHOOL AND LUO SCHOOL

The main academic differences between Su's Shu School and Iwo School lie in two sides. Firstly, there are different assessments about the emotion and it's relation with the human nature.Secondly,there are different series of passing on doctriness and different viewpoints on the relations between literature and doctrine. These differences show that the purports of two schools are different and scholars of two schools strive for the orthodox status in Confucian schools.