| 清代学术史上的盛事:戴震、段玉裁论韵十五年 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李开. 清代学术史上的盛事:戴震、段玉裁论韵十五年[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, 7(6): 98-103 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李开 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学,中文系,江苏,南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 戴、段论韵十五年,在“上古支、脂、之三分”这一著名论题上达成共识,而在“上古真、文分立”问题存在严重分歧。戴震真、文不分与审音中的错误有关。在学理上,戴之审音演绎和段之考古归纳应该互补。十分可贵的是,学术上的分歧丝毫无损于戴、段师生之谊,交友伦理与学术认识互补。
|
| 关 键 词： | 戴震 段玉裁 论韵 上古支、脂、之三分 真、文部 学理方法 学术史论 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-511X(2005)06-0098-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-20 |
Dai Zhen and Duan Yucai''''s fifteen-year discussion of ancient rhymes: a grand occasion in academic history of the Qing Dynasty |
| |
| LI Kai. Dai Zhen and Duan Yucai''''s fifteen-year discussion of ancient rhymes: a grand occasion in academic history of the Qing Dynasty[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science ), 2005, 7(6): 98-103 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Kai |
| |
| Abstract: | It took Dai Zhen and Duan Yucai 15 years to discuss the rhymes and reach the common understanding in the three famous categories of the rhyme of 支,脂and 之(all with the same pronunciation in Chinese).But they had different views on the rhymes of 真(zhen) and 文(wen).Dai's confusing 真 with 文 resulted from his errors in examining the two categories of ancient rhymes zhen and wen.It is beneficial to adopt both deduction and induction in examining sound and ancient philology as they are mutually complementary.Yet the divergence of academic viewpoint did no harm either to the friendship between Dai and Duan or to their researching. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
