| 《阿金》三论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈迪强. 《阿金》三论[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 33(3): 63-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2012.03.011 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈迪强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (大连外国语学院 文化传播学院,辽宁 大连 116044) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 鲁迅的杂文《阿金》在以往的阐释中，多认为阿金是一个恶妇，这种说法欠妥。通过与祥林嫂、子君、阿Q的对比分析可以看出，阿金是一个没有“封建思想”束缚的、性格泼辣的下层女工，她身上体现了“人的启蒙”和“阶级启蒙”的二重性。鲁迅“讨厌阿金”的表述只是借阿金讨论女性的地位，与鲁迅对阿金本人的评价和爱憎是有区别的。从现有资料看，鲁迅更可能是实写阿金，李冬木的“阿金虚构说”缺乏说服力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 鲁迅 阿金 讨厌 虚构 |
Three Views on “Ah Jin” |
| |
| CHEN Di-qiang. Three Views on “Ah Jin”[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Science), 2012, 33(3): 63-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2012.03.011 |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Di-qiang |
| |
| Affiliation: | (School of Cultural Transmission,Dalian University of Foreign Languages,Dalian,Liaoning 116044,China） |
| |
| Abstract: | with regard to "Ah Jin",Lu Xun’s Essay,scholars have been fixing attention on Ah Jin’s character that is a infamous maid.The standpoint is inaccurate.It is distinct to contrast with Xiang Linsao,ZiJun and Ah Q.Ah Jin is a ragtag,a shrewish maid who has no ethic of feudalism.On the other hand,there is complexity concerned with enlightenment of Man and class consciousness.Lu Xun’s presentation of disrelish to Ah Jin hangs in doubt.Li Dongmu’s point of view that Ah Jin is fictive can not be satisfying. |
| |
| Keywords: | Lu Xun Ah Jin disrelish fictive |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
