首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

谁对宏观调控说"不"——探究经济法的可诉性问题
引用本文:丁国民,王慧玲.谁对宏观调控说"不"——探究经济法的可诉性问题[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版),2008,30(1):77-82.
作者姓名:丁国民  王慧玲
作者单位:福州大学法学院,福建,福州,350002
摘    要:探究经济法的可诉性问题重点在于宏观调控法的可诉性问题。而宏观调控法的可诉性问题的正确认识又依赖于对宏观调控及宏观调控法本身属性的正确界定,以及对作为宏观调控法调控主体的政府责任的界定。虽然宏观调控法不能简单地套用传统的三大诉讼法中任何一种,但宏观调控法理论上仍具有可诉性,且与违宪审查机制相关。

关 键 词:宏观调控法  可诉性  违宪审查
文章编号:1672-6219(2008)01-0077-06
修稿时间:2007年9月12日

Who can Say "NO" to Macro-control Conduct——Research on the Justiciability of Economic Law
DING Guo-ming,WANG Hui-ning.Who can Say "NO" to Macro-control Conduct——Research on the Justiciability of Economic Law[J].Journal of China Three Gorges University(Humanities & Social Sciences),2008,30(1):77-82.
Authors:DING Guo-ming  WANG Hui-ning
Abstract:The research of the justiciability of economic law is focused on the justiciability of macro-control law.The correct understanding of the justiciability of macro-control conduct depends on the correct definition to the attribute of macro-control conduct and macro-control law.It depend on the legal duty of the government when it actualize macro-control.Though the dispute of macro-control law is not the same as one of the traditional ternate procedure law,it has Justiciability in theory howbeit.And judicial review should be introduced in the dispute of macro-control law.
Keywords:macro-control law  justiciability  judicial review
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号