"南岛语族"起源研究中"闽台说"商榷

在"南岛语族"起源研究中,语言学的实践多局限于今南岛语族族群分布范围,忽视了华南上古百越这一重要的古南岛系统文化.最近的民族考古学研究又将"原南岛语族"文化说成是闽台沿海新石器时代早期阶段的大坌坑文化和富国墩类型,与百越一南岛一体化的民族文化格局和我国大陆东南到东南亚、太平洋群岛间土著民族考古文化的统一性不相吻合.将富国墩类型之后东南沿海新石器时代晚期的昙石山文化等说成是"南岛语族"文化的终结、"汉藏语族"文化的开端,更割裂了东南史前、上古土著民族文化发展的延续性.

A Questioning to the "Hypothesis of Fujian and Taiwan"in the Studies on the Origin of the Austronesian Cultures

In the studies on the origin of the Austronesian family, the praxis of linguistics has been mainly limited to the distribution of the present Austronesian ethnic groups, while the ancient Baiyue, an important Austronesian culture in ancient southern China has been ignored. A recent archeological research even identified the original Austronesian cultures with the Dabenkeng culture and the Fuguodun pattern in the early New Stone Age, which are found in Fujian and Taiwan. This disagrees with the integrative structure of Baiyue and Austronesian cultures. And it also disagrees with the oneness of the archeological cultures found in China's southeastern coasts, Southeast Asia and the Pacific Archipelago. The statement that the Tanshishan culture, an archeological culture in the late New Stone Age found in China's southeast coast, stands for the end of the Austronesian cultures and the beginning of the Sino Tibentan cultures obviously disconnects the continuity of the development of the ancient ethnic cultures.