矛盾的庄子与庄子的悖论--《逍遥游》的"小大之辩"及其它

本文以《庄子》中的"小大之辩"为主线,探讨了存在于《逍遥游》和《齐物论》两篇重要作品间的矛盾,以及庄子对"大"和"小"的态度,由此揭示了庄子理论与实践、理想与现实间的差异,并对其"逍遥游"的三个层面和逻辑顺序作出新的阐释.认为"逍遥游"的真正价值并不在其理论形态和最终目标,而在庄子对此一境界的追求过程和借此表现的对束缚自我之现实的否定;庄子在现实中对小大的分辩比起他理论中的大小齐一来,对人们认识、理解事物具有更深刻、更普遍的启迪意义.

Conflicting-Hearted Zhuang Zi and His Paradox

With the main thread of the differentiation of "big" and "small" in "Zhuang Zi", this paper intends to explore the contradiction existing in the two famous works"Xiao Yiao You" and "QiWuLun" and Zhuang Zi's attitude toward "big" and "small". Therefore,the discrepancy between Zhuang Zi's theory and practice, his ideal and reality is well revealed. New explanation is made to Xiao Yao You's three levels and logical order. It holds that its true value lies not in its theoretical form and ultimate aim,but in his process of pursuing this state to deny the self-fettered reality. Zhuang Zi's distinguishing of "big" and "small" in reality is more edifying to people's understanding of the things than his equating of them in theory.