公平责任在船舶碰撞损害赔偿中的适用

海商法第167条的规定强调了船舶碰撞事故中无过失免责的原则。然而，分析无过失碰撞的一些具体情况之后会发现，无过失碰撞案件一概以损失自负来处理有的时候会显得有失公平。法律不能将船舶碰撞事故中当事者的有责性转化为损害赔偿责任，因此无法更好地保护受害者的利益。本文就这个问题，尝试从侵权责任法第24条的规定来考虑解决问题的方法，援用公平责任原则去调整无过失碰撞案件中当事人之间的损失分担，从而在具体的情况中能够更好地实现公平正义。

The Application of Billigkeitshaftung in Torts with Collision between Vessels

Article 167 of Maritime Law emphasizes no liability without fault in Torts with Collision between Vessels. However, after analyzing some special situations of no-fauh collision it is found that sometimes it＇s unfair if the damages are borne by those who have suffered them. The law can＇t give an approach for assessing the accountability of no-fault parties, even it＇s necessary, and is unable to protect the interests of victims very well. About the issue, this paper proposes that with Article 24 of Chinese Tort Law, the application of Billigkeitshaftung may share the damages to the parties in no-fauh cases of collision between vessels, so as to achieve fairness and justice in special situations.