| 修辞学是否属于言语的语言学讨论述评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曹德和. 修辞学是否属于言语的语言学讨论述评[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2003, 34(5): 125-131 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曹德和 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南昌大学,人文学院,中文系,江西,南昌,330047 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江西省社会科学研究"十五"(2003-2004)规划项目"修辞学十大理论问题学术讨论述评"成果之一(批准号:03wx39) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 围绕修辞学是否属于言语的语言学,语言学界讨论了近半个世纪,迄今分歧依旧。肯定派和否定派的观点都有道理。之所以产生分歧,原因有三:(1)索绪尔《教程》本身不统一、不严密;(2)语言和言语的划分存在多种方案;(3)研究者考虑问题的侧重点有所不同。
|
| 关 键 词： | 修辞学 言语的语言学 学术讨论 述评 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-0448(2003)05-0125-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-03-16 |
On Whether Rhetoric Belongs to Linguistics de la Parole or Not |
| |
| CAO De-he. On Whether Rhetoric Belongs to Linguistics de la Parole or Not[J]. Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2003, 34(5): 125-131 |
| |
| Authors: | CAO De-he |
| |
| Abstract: | Whether rhetoric belongs to linguistics de la parole or not remains a problem which has been discussed for nearly half a century in the field of linguistics in China. The paper introduces and gives comment on the affirmative and negative points of views and claims that they are both reasonable. There are three factors in the divergence: (1) Saussure's General Course of Linguistics is not perfect, (2) there have been various programs in the division of language and parole, and (3) the focuses of attention of researchers are not the same. And finally the paper puts forward a view on the evaluation of this discussion. |
| |
| Keywords: | rhetoric linguistic de la parole academic discussion review |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
