| 浅析卡尔·波普尔对归纳法的质疑 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 苏金英. 浅析卡尔·波普尔对归纳法的质疑[J]. 南华大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 8(6): 25-27 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 苏金英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南大学政治学与行政管理学院,湖南长沙,410083 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪初涌现的系列科技成果使归纳法遭受质疑，波普尔利用证伪主义对归纳法进行了彻底地批判，并提出了科学知识增长模式。卡尔·波普尔彻底反对归纳法的思想存在着局限性，归纳并不象卡尔·波普尔说的那样，应当从科学方法中剔除出去，其实它和演绎一样，是人们认识的基本方法之一，不可或缺。
|
| 关 键 词： | 卡尔·波普尔 归纳 逻辑实证主义 证伪主义 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-0755(2007)06-0025-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-09-21 |
Analysis on Karl R.Popper''s Being against Induction |
| |
| SU Jin-ying. Analysis on Karl R.Popper''s Being against Induction[J]. Journal of Nanhua University(Social Science Edition), 2007, 8(6): 25-27 |
| |
| Authors: | SU Jin-ying |
| |
| Affiliation: | SU Jin - ying ( Central South University, Changcha 410083, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The emerging of serial scientific and technical achievements at the beginning of the 20th century make induction queried.Popper utilized the falsification to completely criticize induction and proposed the increasing of scientific knowledge model.The thought that Karl R.Popper objected to induction has limitations,and the induction is always one of the fundamental ways for human cognition,and it shouldn't be excluded from methodology of science.The induction is as important as the deduction. |
| |
| Keywords: | Karl R.Popper induction logical positivism falsificationism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
