首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

“两个翅膀论”:一个似是而非的错误理论——再致范伯群先生
引用本文:袁良骏. “两个翅膀论”:一个似是而非的错误理论——再致范伯群先生[J]. 汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2005, 21(3): 8-12,27
作者姓名:袁良骏
作者单位:中国社会科学院文学研究所,北京,100732
摘    要:中国现代文学的“两个翅膀论”,支持、呼应者颇多,但实际上是一个似是而非的错误理论。为什么说它似是而非?因为两个翅膀比一个翅膀好,这就是它的“似是”,它的幌子,而它的实质则在贬损、否定“五四”新文学,为“鸳蝴派”翻案,拉中国文学向后转。其次,“两个翅膀论”故意在严肃文学、通俗文学与低俗文学之间制造混乱,故意曲解“五四”新文学一步步民族化、通俗化,雅俗共赏的历史,为低俗文学鸣锣开道。

关 键 词:中国现代文学  “两个翅膀论”  错误理论  “鸳蝴派”  “五四”新文学
文章编号:1001-4225(2005)03-0008-005
修稿时间:2005-03-09

On the Theory of Two Wings: A Seemingly Correct yet Wrong Theory - A Second Response to Mr.Fan Boqun
YUAN Liang-jun. On the Theory of Two Wings: A Seemingly Correct yet Wrong Theory - A Second Response to Mr.Fan Boqun[J]. Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition), 2005, 21(3): 8-12,27
Authors:YUAN Liang-jun
Abstract:There are many supporters of the theory of “the Two Wings", but this theory is seemingly correct yet wrong. Its being so-called “correct" lies in its presupposition that two wings are better than one, but its essence is to degrade and deny the New May 4 Literature, and to reverse the verdict of the school of “Yuanhu", thus turning Chinese literature away from the right path. Secondly, the theory of “Two Wings" creates disorder on purpose among serious literature, popular literature and vulgar literature. It intentionally distorts the history of the New May 4 literature in terms of the gradual development in its nationalization, popularization and suiting both the refined and popular tastes, thus paving the way for vulgar literature.
Keywords:modern Chinese literature   the theory of “the Two Wings"     wrong theory   the school of “Yuanhu"     New May 4 Literature
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号