首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Eliciting and Classifying Concerns: A Methodological Critique
Authors:Thomas Webler  Horst Rakel  Ortwin Renn  Branden Johnson
Institution:132 Farley Road, Wendell, Massachusetts 01379.;Center for Environmental and Risk Management, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.;Center for Technology Assessment, Industriestrasse 5, D-70565 Stuttgart, Germany.;New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Science and Research, Risk Communication Unit, CN 409, 401 East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey 08625.;To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract:Two methodological steps in the study of peoples'concerns are elicitation and classification. Elicitation of concerns through analytical methods such as surveys can be supplemented with techniques that perform more diversively. We present two examples of how this can be accomplished: one in the expert community and one in the lay community. A classification taxonomy is a subjective choice of the researcher and it can only be evaluated against the stated objectives of the research. We present a classification schema that is explicitly oriented toward diagnosing the substantive needs of public discourses about risk decision making. To illustrate how concerns can be elicited in a social setting and how this classification tool can be applied, we report on a public participation exercise in New Jersey where citizens discussed the impacts of land application of sewage sludge at an experimental farm.
Keywords:Public participation  risk communication  democracy  concerns  causal model  policy making
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号