| 网络证据认定问题研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汪振林.网络证据认定问题研究[J].重庆邮电学院学报(社会科学版),2010(1):21-26,58. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汪振林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆邮电大学法学院; |
| |
| 基金项目： | 重庆市教委人文社会科学研究项目:电子证据认证规则研究(08JWSK026) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 立法应把网络证据（电子证据）规定为一类新的证据，与原有的七种证据并列，从而解决网络证据的“合法身份”问题；非法秘密录制方式获得的网络证据不具备可采性，通过非法搜查、扣押等方式获得的网络证据，情节严重的一般不予采纳；法院在认定网络证据的真实性时，在证据契约方式、自认方式场合主要是审查这些方式的合法有效性，在鉴定方式的场合主要是审查鉴定的内容。
|
| 关 键 词： | 网络证据 合法性 真实性 |
Research on the Identification of Network Evidence |
| |
| WANG Zhen-lin.Research on the Identification of Network Evidence[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition),2010(1):21-26,58. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Zhen-lin |
| |
| Institution: | Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications;Chongqing 400065;China |
| |
| Abstract: | Legislation should provide the network evidence(electronic evidence) as a new class of evidence,side by side with the original seven kinds of evidence.In this way,we could solve the network's legal status issues.Secretly recording the illegal way to obtain the network evidence does not have the admissibility.Through the ways accessing to the network evidence,such as illegal search and seizure,the case that is serious can not be normally accepted.When the Court identifying the authenticity of the network evi... |
| |
| Keywords: | network evidence validity authenticity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
