文学史中的“错位”类型分析

对同一文学史实在不同的文学史著述中可能有很大的反差,包括发展线索、动力、走向等等各有不同表述,这就是文学史的错位。文章分为四部分来论述:首先,价值评定中的错位,对于作品价值、作家地位,根据不同的文学观念有不同的认识。其次,在文学发展中的影响关系有不同梳理,形成错位。再次,由于所参照的对象不同,有比较视角下的错位。最后,造成错位的其他方面的原因,以及文学史的续写的思考。

An Analysis of the Dislocation Type in Literary History

The different literary history works may vary greatly in their description of the same historical facts,including the trail,impetus and trend of the development,which is known as the dislocation of the literary history.The paper develops this point from following aspects: Firstly,the dislocation in valuation,the different cognition of works value and writer status based on different literary perception;Secondly,the dislocation formed by different categorization of influential relation in the development of literature;Thirdly;the dislocation from a comparative perspective caused by different objects of reference;Lastly,other causes of dislocation and the consideration of extending the literary history writing.