首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

拿来之后——期待可能性本土化之思考
引用本文:郑丽萍,丁善超.拿来之后——期待可能性本土化之思考[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2011,24(5):53-57.
作者姓名:郑丽萍  丁善超
作者单位:北京航空航天大学法学院,北京,100191;北京航空航天大学法学院,北京,100191
摘    要:期待可能性理论有坚实的哲学和法理基础,在关注人性、体现刑法谦抑性和发挥刑罚功能等方面具有强大的理论吸引力,但是也存在对罪刑法定原则可能构成潜在危害,对法官素质具有较高要求,对完善的配套法律制度较为依赖等问题。因此,引进该理论应当慎重,应当在明确该理论在中国犯罪构成中的地位、在中国刑法和刑法理论中的功能,并设置相应的程序保障后再予以适用。

关 键 词:期待可能性  人性  谦抑  困境  本土化

Reflection on the Localization of Expected Possibility Theory
Zheng Liping,Ding Shanchao.Reflection on the Localization of Expected Possibility Theory[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(Social Sciences Edition),2011,24(5):53-57.
Authors:Zheng Liping  Ding Shanchao
Institution:Zheng Liping,Ding Shanchao(School of Law,Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Beijing 100191,China)
Abstract:Expected possibility theory has solid philosophical and legal theoretical basis which has great interests in the aspects of?human nature,restrained principle of criminal law and the function of penalty.However,this theory may also constitute potential hazard to the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a specified crime,and has high quality requirements of the judges,and relies much more on a perfect matching legal system.Based on these perspectives,the introduction of this theory should be cautious.It should not be applied until it has a clear position in the system of Constitution of Crime in China as well as the set of approprate procedural guarantee.
Keywords:expected possibility  human nature  restrained principle of criminal law  dilemma  localization  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号