首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

归因与归责:刑事医疗诉讼中鉴定机构与法院的角色定位
引用本文:杨柳.归因与归责:刑事医疗诉讼中鉴定机构与法院的角色定位[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,15(3):115-120.
作者姓名:杨柳
作者单位:东南大学法学院,南京,211189
基金项目:湖北省教育厅基金资助项目“转型时期侵犯财产犯罪研究”(201010217)
摘    要:在刑事医疗诉讼中, 鉴定机构和法院的关系应当是刑法上“归因”与“归责”的关系。归因是因果关系的判断, 是事实判断;归责是刑事责任的判断, 是价值判断。中国刑法中所使用的“归责”不同于大陆法系三阶层犯罪论体系中使用的“归责”, 区分归因与归责对于准确界定鉴定机构和法院之间的功能与角色以及医疗诉讼的处理具有重要意义。

关 键 词:归因与归责  客观归责  鉴定结论
收稿时间:3/3/2012 12:00:00 AM

Attribution and Liability:the Role and Position of Medical Identification Mechanism and the Court in the Criminal Litigation
YANG liu.Attribution and Liability:the Role and Position of Medical Identification Mechanism and the Court in the Criminal Litigation[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2013,15(3):115-120.
Authors:YANG liu
Institution:1.School of Law, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
Abstract:In the criminal medical litigation, the relationship between appraisal mechanism and the court should be that of the “attribution” and “imputation” in criminal law. Attribution is the judgment of causality, and is factual judgments; imputation is of criminal liability judgment, and is value judgment. The criminal law in China which uses “attribution” is different from continental law system where three classes crime constitution theory is used in the “attribution”. To distinguish between attribution and imputation in order to accurately define the role and function of the appraisal mechanism and the court as well as the treatment of medical litigation has important significance.
Keywords:attribution and attribution  the objective imputation  identification conclusion
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号