首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

知识产权执法若干问题探讨——TRIPS与我国知识产权法律有关问题的比较研究
引用本文:张耕. 知识产权执法若干问题探讨——TRIPS与我国知识产权法律有关问题的比较研究[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2003, 21(4): 51-56
作者姓名:张耕
作者单位:西南政法大学,知识产权研究中心,重庆,400031
摘    要:世界贸易组织中的TRIPS协议从实体和程序两方面对知识产权执法问题作了明确规定.本文从知识产权侵权赔偿归责原则、赔偿数额的确定、知识产权纠纷的行政处理、临时禁令、诉前财产保全和诉前证据保全方面,把新<专利法>、<商标法>和<著作权法>与TRIPS进行了比较研究,指出我国知识产权法律符合国际先进标准,但在如何防止知识产权权利人滥用权利等方面仍值得改进.

关 键 词:知识产权  赔偿  行政处理  禁令
文章编号:1000-5099(2003)04-0051-06
修稿时间:2003-04-10

A Probe into the Problems about the Implementation of the Intellectual Property Right——A comparative study of the laws related to intellectual property right and TRIPS
ZHANG Geng. A Probe into the Problems about the Implementation of the Intellectual Property Right——A comparative study of the laws related to intellectual property right and TRIPS[J]. Journal of Guizhou University(Social Science), 2003, 21(4): 51-56
Authors:ZHANG Geng
Abstract:The TRIPS of WTO has stipulated substantively and procedurally about the Intellectual Property Law. The present paper conducts a comparative study of Chinas Patent Act, Trademark Act, Copyright Act with the TRIPS, and finds that the principles for the compensations for intellectual rights, the amount of money, the administrative settlement of the intellectual property issues, the temporary injunction, the preservation of the property and the evidence are, in the main, in line with the TRIPS. This enables Chinese intellectual laws to live up to the international standards. However, there is stili much room for improvement about the restraint of the property holder to abuse their right to action and the temporary injunction ( or temporary restraining order).
Keywords:intellectual property law  compensation  administrative settlement injunction  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号