首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论证明妨害的规制
引用本文:邹政.论证明妨害的规制[J].湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,15(5):32-35.
作者姓名:邹政
作者单位:虎丘区人民法院,江苏,苏州,215007
摘    要:证明妨害严重违背了诚实信用原则和诉讼平等原则,侵害了他人的诉讼利益,应当予以规制。对证明妨害的制裁依据应区分不同的过错形态,分别采取经验法则说和实体法上的义务违反说。对证明妨害的规制措施,不宜单一化,而应由法官进行自由裁量,这样才更具合理性和操作性。

关 键 词:证明妨害  规制方法  经验法则说  义务违反说  自由裁量说
收稿时间:2010/5/25 0:00:00

On the Restriction of Evidence Spoliation
ZOU Zheng.On the Restriction of Evidence Spoliation[J].Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2010,15(5):32-35.
Authors:ZOU Zheng
Institution:People's Court of Hu Qiu District
Abstract:Evidence spoliation seriously violates the honesty, credibility and equality of litigation as well as infringes litigant's interest, so it should be restricted. Sanctions on evidence spoliation should distinguish according to the fault patterns, adopting the theory of empirical rule and the theory of duty violation in the substantive law respectively. Restriction of evidence spoliation shouldn't be simplified. To ensure its rationality and feasibility, the judge's free discretion is inevitable.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号