语境视阈中克里普克指称理论的考察与反思

在当代哲学中,语境论作为哲学研究的基本背景和指称确定的关键性因素,已经成为学界共识。克里普克从实在论立场出发维护指称概念的地位,这从一个侧面为语境实在论探索意义与指称关系的科学解释提供了理论借鉴。因果历史理论包含了丰富的语用思想,强调语用语境对于确定名称所指依据的重要性,但它与语境论所倡导的语形、语义、语用相结合的整体思维仍然存在较大差别。同时,在后现代语境论的视野中,一方面,因果历史理论未能完全超越规范语言学派的局限,体现出绝对所指观的狭隘性;另一方面,他对于指称心理因素的重视又与后现代语境论主体心理意向的回归存在着内在的关联和契合。

The Study of Kripke's Reference Theory in the Context

In modern philosophy,it is popular that context is regarded as a basic background of philosophical study and a key factor to determine reference.Kripke sticks to the concept of reference from a position of realism,which provides a theoretical reference for contextual realism to implore the scientific explanation of meaning and reference's relation.The casual historical theory contains abundant pragmatic ideas and stress the importance of pragmatic context in determining reference.It is different from context's integral thought,which advocates the combination of morphology,semantics and pragmatics.At the same time,in the field of post-modern context,on the one hand,the casual historical theory cannot overpass the confinement of formal language and represents a narrowness of absolute reference.On the other hand,he pays more attention to reference's psychological factors,which has an internal correlation and conformity with the return of subject's psychological intention in post-modern context.