文学史命名与写作中的历史思维反思

从文学史的命名到写作，文学史中的历史思维一直左右着文学思维，历史一直作为文学的线索思路，研究方法，切割依据甚至对应形式而存在，而对文学本身的感悟力，想象力，审美力却强调不足。文学史中文学感的缺失是当前文学史写作中存在的关键问题。在当前洪子诚及陈思和的文学史写作中仍然没有突破历史思维建立起真正的文学思维。文学史写作中应以人怎样在地球上生存与发展为总主题，以提高人的文学感悟力，想象力和审美力为总目标．以文学自身的演变规律为总方向，以生态的而非进化的观照为总思路来建构文学思维。

Reflect on the Naming and the Historical Thought in Writing of the Literary History

From the naming to the writing of the literary history,the historical thought of the literary history always directs the literary thought.The history has always been existing as clue thought,research ways,partition standard and even the corresponding forms of the literature.But it stresses little sensibility,imagination and aesthetics of literature itself.The absence of literature sense is the key problem in the current writing of the literary history.HONG Zi-cheng and CHEN Si-he's current writing of the literary history hasn't broken through the historical thought to establish the true literary thought.The writing of the literary history should take how the human beings to exist and develop better on the Earth as the general subject,how to improve people's literary sensibility,imagination and aesthetics as the general aim,the literature's own evolutional laws as the total direction,and the ecology not the evolution as the general thought to construct the literary thought.