Social work,postmodernism, and marxism |
| |
Authors: | Lain Ferguson Michael Lavalette |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Dept. of Applied Social Studies , University of Paisley , High Street, Paisley, Renfrewshire, PA1 2BE E-mail: ferg-asO@Paisley.ac.uk;2. Dept. of Sociology , University of Liverpool , Eleanor Rathbone Building, Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 7ZA E-mail: M.Lavalet-te@liv.ac.uk |
| |
Abstract: | This article sets out to question two dominant trends in social work theorizing: ‘pure postmodernism and those attempts to revitalize emancipatory social work by combining elements of postmodernism with elements of a broadly Althusserian Marxism. The article starts by addressing the foundations of postmodern theorizing in social work, rejecting its claims for emancipatory theory. It proceeds to look at the concern with language and identity within this paradigm and suggests that, as formulated, neither offers an adequate understanding of the material hardship and oppressions facing clients. Writing from a classical Marxist perspective, the authors argue that the influence of postmodernism is a backward step in trying to understand the poverty, oppression, and inequality facing the majority of social work clients. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|