首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

解析地役权客体——以《城乡规划法》为视角
引用本文:曲天明,杨杰.解析地役权客体——以《城乡规划法》为视角[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2010,31(4).
作者姓名:曲天明  杨杰
作者单位:1. 大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116024;青岛科技大学政法学院,山东青岛266061
2. 大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连,116024
基金项目:中国法学会部级法学研究立项课题(D08030); 山东省教育厅人文社会科学研究计划项目(J08WD60)
摘    要:地役权制度虽已源远流长,但对于我国来说还是"新"的制度。无论从历史、比较的多维视角,还是从法律概念自身的逻辑解释以及《物权法》的整体,乃至从我国法律体系来看,地役权的客体仅适用土地。它在创设时必然会与城乡规划法相遇,当下地役权受到城乡规划法的限制,在实践中未能发挥其提高土地利用效率的功能。借鉴国外的经验,国家作为土地所有权人在土地的用益物权之前预设地役权,对城乡土地进行规划,达到维护公共利益目的,同时亦受行政程序和法律责任的规制,这样地役权制度在我国必然有广阔的空间。

关 键 词:物权  地役权  土地  城乡规划法

Analysis of the Object of Easement from the Perspective of Urban and Rural Planning Law
QU Tian-ming,YANG Jie.Analysis of the Object of Easement from the Perspective of Urban and Rural Planning Law[J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences),2010,31(4).
Authors:QU Tian-ming  YANG Jie
Institution:QU Tian-ming1,2,YANG Jie11.School of Law,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian 116024,China,2.School of Political Science , Law,Qingdao University of Science , Technology,Qingdao 266061
Abstract:Despite the long history of easement,it is still a new system in China.However,either from the historical perspective and the multi-dimensional perspective,or from the logic of the legal concept itself,and the Chinese legal system as a whole,the object of easement can only be land.The easement in China is bound to be restricted by the urban and rural planning law.The empirical research shows that the present easement cannot realize its function in improving the use efficiency of land.To refer to foreign exp...
Keywords:property  easement  land  Urban and Rural Planning Law  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号