网络犯罪专门性问题流转的虚置与盘活——基于事实建构与技术审查的双重考量

网络犯罪案件中,专门性问题的研判是制约证据裁判原则合理适用的重要因素。由于取证人员不充分取证,控辩双方低水平举证质证,法官形式化认证与技术性鉴真手段及文本缺失等现象泛滥,难以避免专门性问题在庭审流转中的虚置,进而影响司法正义的实现。以数据恢复与去重处理的电子数据相关专门性问题研判为实证对象,以判决书的技术性质证认证内容为研判素材,对四十六份裁判文书展开实证研究,可以对专门性问题研判乱象的阐释提供新的视角。我国可在事实建构理论的指导下,重新审视“专人专事”的技术审查原则,借鉴多伯特规则中“法官参与”的要求,辅以技术鉴真与证据运用案例参考,以实现专门性问题的合理解决和盘活。

The Virtual Setting and Activation of Network Crime Specialized Problem Circulation: Based on the Dual Considerations of Factual Construction and Technical Review

In cybercrime cases, the study and judgment of specialization is an important factor restricting the reasonable application of the principle of evidence adjudication. Due to insufficient evidence collection by forensic personnel, low level of evidence production and cross-examination by both sides of the prosecution and defense, and the lack of text of formal authentication and technical authentication means of judges, it is difficult to avoid the lack of expertise in the circulation of the trial, thus affecting the realization of judicial justice. The empirical study of forty-six judicial documents is carried out by taking the technical cross-examination and authentication content of the judicial documents as the empirical research object, which may provide a new perspective for the interpretation of the confusion in the research and judgment of the specialized problems. Under the guidance of the theory of fact construction, our country can learn from the requirement of "judge participation" in Daubert rule, re-examine the technical review principle of "special person and special service", supplemented by technical appraisal and evidence application case reference, so as to realize the reasonable solution and activation of specialized problems.