Newcomb's many problems |
| |
Authors: | Isaac Levi |
| |
Institution: | (1) Columbia University, Columbia, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Newcomb's paradox rests on two arguments one appealing to the principle of maximizing expected utility and one appealing to dominance in order to generate conflicting recommendations in certain kinds of choice situations. In my essay, I argue that the applications of the principle of maximizing expected utility and of the dominance principle are both fallacious and that the specification of the decision problem is too indeterminate to render a verdict between the two options considered. I also show that if Nozick's case for invoking the dominance principle is taken seriously, it leads to contradictions. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|