首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Privatizing public pension systems: Lessons from Latin America
Institution:1. Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran;2. Deprtment of Nanobiotechnology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran;3. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran;1. Department of Population Health Science and Policy and the Blavatnik Family Women''s Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY;2. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI;3. Division of Research, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI;4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI;5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI;1. Facultad de Economía, Gobierno y Comunicaciones, Universidad Central de Chile, Lord Cochrane 417, Santiago, Chile;2. Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Av. Lib. O’Higgins 3363, Santiago, Chile;3. Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Av. Lib. O’Higgins 3363, Estación Central, Santiago, Chile;1. Department of Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China;2. LeBow College of Business, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan People’s Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
Abstract:The major goal of this analysis is to examine the pros and cons of privatizing public pension schemes based on the Latin American experience. The study draws on evidence from four countries that have fully privatized their public pension schemes (Chile, Mexico, Bolivia, and El Salvador) and four that have partially privatized (Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia, and Peru). Some evidence suggests that privatization is having positive economic effects, contributing to the development of financial institutions and the availability of investment capital. It may also be increasing national savings rates and the rates of economic growth, but on these issues there is less agreement. The benefits of privatization go primarily to high-wage male workers with few benefits for low-wage and female workers. As a result, privatization contributes to both income and gender inequality. Efforts to draw lessons for the US must take into consideration numerous political and economic differences.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号