| 试论佛经翻译史上的“文”“质”之争 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨晓华. 试论佛经翻译史上的“文”“质”之争[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版), 2003, 29(2): 44-47 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨晓华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西北民族学院,蒙古语言文学系,甘肃,兰州,730030 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 信、达、雅之争和直译、意译之争是中国佛经翻译史上的文、质之争的延续.面对这场翻译标准的争论,不应各执一端.对于文质之争、信达雅之争、直译与意译之争,它们的本质并不是矛盾的,而应该是互补的.对此辜正坤先生提出的"多元互补论"就是很好的立意,有益于正确认识我国翻译史上一脉相承的翻译标准的争论.
|
| 关 键 词： | 佛经翻译 文、质之争 信、达、雅之争 直译、意译之争 多元互补论 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-0215(2003)02-0044-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-06-14 |
The Debates of Content and Nature on Buddhism's Scricpture Translation |
| |
| YANG Xiao-hua. The Debates of Content and Nature on Buddhism's Scricpture Translation[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities(Social Sciences), 2003, 29(2): 44-47 |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Xiao-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | In China,debates among faithfulness,coherence and elegance and between literal translation and liberal one derive from disputes between content and nature in history of translation .It is not essentially contradictory.but complementary to arguments between content and nature,faithfulnees,coherence and elegance,Therefore,professor Gu Zhengshen brings forward innovatively monifold complementary theory beneficial to understand further continuous discussions upon standated of translation in the Chinese History of translation. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
