首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国高校人文社科团队绩效评价指标体系研究——基于IMO模型分析
引用本文:李贞,张体勤. 中国高校人文社科团队绩效评价指标体系研究——基于IMO模型分析[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 24(2): 77-86. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2018.02.007
作者姓名:李贞  张体勤
作者单位:山东财经大学工商管理学院,山东济南,250014
基金项目:教育部专项委托项目"高等学校人文社科学术创新团队绩效评价体系研究"(12JF001);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"基于知识网络能力的高校协同创新绩效提升机制研究"(14YJCZH085);山东省软科学研究重大项目"山东省自然科学基金绩效评估指标体系研究"(2015RZB01015)
摘    要:绩效评价的薄弱与错位已成为制约中国高校人文社科团队健康发展的突出问题.文章立足于团队绩效管理理论,结合人文社会科学的学科学术属性和科研发展规律,明晰高校人文社科团队绩效评价的“投入—中介—产出”(IMO)模型,识别高校人文社科团队绩效构成要素,分层次遴选关键绩效指标,应用群组层次分析法计算指标权重,构建了由3个一级指标、15个二级指标和50个三级指标组成的高校人文社科团队绩效评价指标体系,为加强中国高校人文社科团队建设、繁荣哲学社会科学提供具有参考价值的政策工具.

关 键 词:学术创新团队  人文社会科学  IMO模型  团队绩效评价
收稿时间:2017-08-12

Performance evaluation index system for academic innovation team of humanity and social science in universities based on IMO model
LI Zhen and ZHANG Tiqin. Performance evaluation index system for academic innovation team of humanity and social science in universities based on IMO model[J]. Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition), 2018, 24(2): 77-86. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.2018.02.007
Authors:LI Zhen and ZHANG Tiqin
Affiliation:Business Administration School, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, P. R. China and Business Administration School, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, P. R. China
Abstract:The weakness and dislocation of performance evaluation has restricted the development of academic innovation team of humanity and social science (AITHSS) in universities. Based on the team performance management theory,considering the academic attribute and development law of humanity and social science,this paper summed up the IMO model of team performance evaluation,distinguished the key performance elements and constructed the performance evaluation index system of AITHSS. The performance evaluation index system,which included three 1-class indexes,fifteen 2-class indexes and fifty 3-class indexes,could be a useful policy tool for strengthening the AITHSS''s construction in Chinese universities and the prosperity of philosophy and social science.
Keywords:academic innovation team  humanity and social science  IMO model  team performance evaluation
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号