首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论物权法和债权法的关系及对我国物权立法的启示
引用本文:罗晓静.论物权法和债权法的关系及对我国物权立法的启示[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,37(3):68-73.
作者姓名:罗晓静
作者单位:郑州大学,法学院,河南,郑州,450052
摘    要:物权法和债权法的分立起源于罗马法.二者的分立是大陆法系民法理论分析和法典构架的基石.但近现代以来,物权法和债权法出现了融合,尤其表现为物权的债权化和债权的物权化.我国物权立法的定位和制度设计应在坚持物权法和债权法分立、物权与债权区分的前提下,针对二者融合的趋势作出立法上的调整.

关 键 词:物权法  债权法  分立  融合
文章编号:1001-8204(2004)03-0068-06
修稿时间:2004年1月10日

On the Relation Between Law of Material Right and Law of Obligation and its Enlightenment to the Construction of Law of Material Right in our Country
LUO Xiao-jing.On the Relation Between Law of Material Right and Law of Obligation and its Enlightenment to the Construction of Law of Material Right in our Country[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2004,37(3):68-73.
Authors:LUO Xiao-jing
Abstract:The partition of law of material right and law of obligation originated from Roman Law. The partition of the two is the theoretic analysis of the civil law and the foundation of the frame of the code of the continent law system. However, as the time goes on, the two get compromised, i. e. they show themselves as turning each other. The positioning and system design of our country's legislation of law of material right should make proper adjustment against the compromising trend of the two on the promise of adhering to the partition as well as the difference of law of material right and law of obligation.
Keywords:Law of material right  law of obligation  partition  compromise  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号