首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

艺术活动论评析
引用本文:王元骧.艺术活动论评析[J].文史哲,2001,1(1):38-48.
作者姓名:王元骧
作者单位:浙江大学,中文系,浙江,杭州,313028
摘    要:根据马克思主义创始人关于“人的活动”的理论来说 ,活动论文艺观与侧重于从认识的角度研究文艺的反映论文艺观不同 ,它主要从意志的角度 ,把文艺活动看作是作家确定目的、根据目的来支配、调节自己的行动在对象世界中实现自己目的的过程 ,它不仅是自由的 ,也是自觉的。并根据这一基本认识评述了当前我国文艺活动论研究的功过得失 ,在肯定其对于文艺理论发展贡献的同时 ,也指出了有些持艺术活动论观点的学者以强调艺术活动的自发性、自由性来否定艺术活动的自觉性和目的性的偏颇。表明活动论文艺观与反映论文艺观作为马克思主义文艺学研究的不同视角 ,它们之间不是互相排斥 ,而是相互补充 ,有着理论自身内在而深刻的统一性

关 键 词:人的活动  艺术活动  意志活动
文章编号:0511-4721(2001)01-0038-11
修稿时间:2000年7月23日

Comment on arts activities theory
Abstract:According to Marxism founder's theory of “human activities”, it is regarded that the arts activities theory, different from the arts theory which is based on the reflection theory and inclines to study arts with laying special emphasis on knowledge, lay special emphasis on man's will and regard arts activities as a process during which authors have had a objective and regulate their actions to fulfill this objective in the object world, the arts activities are liberated as well as conscious. Based on this recognition, this paper discusses the successes and failures of Chinese arts activities theory studies, confirms their contributions for the development of arts theory and at the same time, criticizes some scholars' partialities that, they insist the arts activities theory to stress the freedom and spontaneity of arts activities but deny the consciousness and objective of arts activities. This paper also shows that the arts activities theory and arts reflection theory, as different visual angles of studying Marxism arts theory, are complementary to each other rather than rejecting to each other, they have theoretically intrinsic and deep unity.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号