| 最弱国家的内在逻辑与现实困境：诺齐克的消极国家观探析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 庞金友,张霞.最弱国家的内在逻辑与现实困境：诺齐克的消极国家观探析[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2011,27(3):134-139. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 庞金友 张霞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学政治与公共管理学院,北京,102249 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社科基金项目“当代西方国家与社会关系思想研究”，中国政法大学人文社科研究项目“西方政治思潮与改革开放以来中国现代政治意识的变迁”(20110430) 中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队资助项目“政治文明与政治发展研究” |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对罗尔斯式的积极国家观,诺齐克提出,最弱国家才是最好的国家形式。通过对无政府主义和多功能国家的批判,诺齐克认为,最弱国家不仅有产生的必要性而且是功能发挥最多的国家,任何主张扩大国家功能的做法势必会侵犯个人权利。最弱国家是可欲的,它为个人自由实现其权利提供了理想的乌托邦架构。考虑到现实社会经济等因素,这种最弱国家并不适合处于转型期的发展中国家。
|
| 关 键 词： | 个人权利 最弱国家 诺齐克 消极国家观 |
The Internal Logic and Practical Dilemma of a Minimal State：Analysis of Robert Nozick＇s Negative State Conception |
| |
| PANG Jin-you,ZHANG Xia.The Internal Logic and Practical Dilemma of a Minimal State：Analysis of Robert Nozick＇s Negative State Conception[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition),2011,27(3):134-139. |
| |
| Authors: | PANG Jin-you ZHANG Xia |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Political Science and Public Adminastration China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 102249,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Different from John Rawls＇s positive state conception,Robert Nozick points out that minimal state is the best form.By criticizing anarchism and multi-fuctional state,Nozick argues that the minimal state is necessary and also the most functional.Any practice of expanding the fuction of state would infringe individual＇s rights.Minimal state is pratical;it can offer the ideal Utopia for individuals to carry out rights freely.Considering the social and economic practical factors,the minimal state does not suit developing countries which are undergoing a period of transforming. |
| |
| Keywords: | individual rights minimal state Robert Nozick negetative state conception |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
