| 美国生态文学的三种分类及其比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 姜渭清,方丽青. 美国生态文学的三种分类及其比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 0(1): 95-101 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 姜渭清 方丽青 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]浙江工商大学外国语学院 [2]浙江农林大学外国语学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 阐述了美国学者莱昂对自然书写、默菲对自然取向的文学及斯洛维克对环境文学的三种分类方法,分析并比较了三种方法的优缺点.莱昂的分类指出了自然书写的多样性,但所涉及的文本范围比较狭窄,只限于自然书写;默菲的分类所涵盖的文本范围在莱昂的基础上有很大扩展,包括了小说和诗歌,但其分类标准复杂;斯洛维克的分类因为涵盖全面、便于操作而成为美国学界普遍认同的分类方法.
|
| 关 键 词： | 自然书写 自然取向的文学 环境文学 分类 |
On Taxonomy of American Ecological Literature |
| |
| Jiang Weiqing,Fang Liqing. On Taxonomy of American Ecological Literature[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 0(1): 95-101 |
| |
| Authors: | Jiang Weiqing Fang Liqing |
| |
| Affiliation: | Jiang Weiqing,Fang Liqing |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper compares Lyon＇s taxonomy of nature writing, Murphy＇s taxonomy of nature-oriented literature and Slovic＇s taxonomy of environmental literature by analyzing the pros and cons of them. Lyon points out the variet- ies of nature writing but his taxonomy is only limited to the texts of nature writing. Murphy＇s taxonomy includes po- ems and fictions, but is very complex. Slovic＇s taxonomy, practical and comprehensive, is widely accepted. |
| |
| Keywords: | nature writing nature-oriented literature environmental literature taxonomy |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
