| 茅盾文论话语类析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 吴国群.茅盾文论话语类析[J].绍兴文理学院学报,2002,22(3):71-75. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 吴国群 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 绍兴文理学院,浙江,绍兴,312000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 茅盾的文论话语约可分为三类 :一为以现实主义理论为主的文艺理论家的文论话语 ;二为贯彻指示 ,提供政治导向的领导者的文论话语 ;三为用于评论作家作品的文论话语。第一类文论话语得之于前期的开放而失之于后期的封闭 ;第二类则纯属“角色”话语 ;唯第三类文论话略虽呈片断状态 ,却是真正突破中西权威理论“优位性和霸权性”“中心化力量”的充满个人创见的自由言说 ,因而也最具价值和生命活力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文论话语 知识谱系学 逻辑学范式 现象学范式 作家作品论 还原释读 现象统观 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-293X(2002)03-0071-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年6月20日 |
On Mao Dun's Literary Review Words |
| |
| Wu Guoqun.On Mao Dun's Literary Review Words[J].Journal of Shaoxing College of Arts and Sciences,2002,22(3):71-75. |
| |
| Authors: | Wu Guoqun |
| |
| Abstract: | Mao Dun's Literary review words can be in three types:words of literary theorists who mainly base their theories on realism;words of leadership who provide political direction;words used to review the works of writers.The author believes that the first type gains from the earlier open stage and loses from the later close stage;that the second type is simply"character"words;and that only the third one,though appearing extracts,is the free speech full of personal opinions,which indeed break through chinese-Western authoritative theories"Superiority and Supremacy"and "Centralized strength",and therefore it's the most valuable and liveliest one. |
| |
| Keywords: | literary review wors knowledge pedigree logic pattern phenomenological pattern review for writers' works general observation of phenomenon |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
