| 司法三段论的迷局破解 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 聂长建.司法三段论的迷局破解[J].学术探索,2010(2):73-80. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 聂长建 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南财经政法大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430074 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目"法律推理研究--语用学与语用逻辑的视角"的阶段性成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 三段论的大前提具有普遍必然性，司法三段论的大前提具有或然性。三段论的大前提对小前提的涵摄关系是就外延宽窄而言，司法三段论的大前提对小前提的涵摄关系是就构成要件而言。三段论的大、小前提只具有“真值”一个维度，司法三段论的大、小前提则具有“真值”和“价值”两个维度。因此，司法三段论不可能像三段论那样机械地操作，司法三段论的适用对法官的司法能力提出很高的要求。
|
| 关 键 词： | 三段论 司法三段论 涵摄 价值判断 |
The Analysis of the Maze in Judicial Syllogism |
| |
| NIE Chang-jian.The Analysis of the Maze in Judicial Syllogism[J].Academic Research,2010(2):73-80. |
| |
| Authors: | NIE Chang-jian |
| |
| Institution: | NIE Chang-jian(Law School,Zhongnan University of Economics , Law,Wuhan,430074,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The major premise of syllogism is of universal inevitability,while that of the judicial syllogism has probability.The subsumtion relationship of the major premise to the minor premise of syllogism consists in their extension,while that of the judicial syllogism lies in their constituent elements.The major and minor premises of syllogism have only one dimension named true value,but those of the judicial syllogism have two dimensions called true value and value.Therefore,the judicial syllogism can not be hand... |
| |
| Keywords: | syllogism the judicial syllogism subsumtion value judgment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
