| 自由与法制——兼评“法制与理想自由之间存在内在联系” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马修·H.克莱默,赵树坤.自由与法制——兼评“法制与理想自由之间存在内在联系”[J].求是学刊,2012(1):68-76. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马修·H.克莱默 赵树坤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 剑桥大学
2. 西南政法大学 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文章围绕消极自由概念,厘清了相对于积极自由的消极自由、相对于共和主义自由的消极自由以及道义自由与人身自由的区分;在此基础上,分析了尼格.西蒙自由概念的不足之处,以及他关于法律与理想自由之间存在内在联系这一自然法主张的缺陷。
|
| 关 键 词： | 作为消极自由的自由 积极自由 共和主义自由 道义自由与人身自由 自由与法制 |
Freedom and Legality Also on "Innate Connection between Legality and Ideal Freedom" |
| |
| Matthew H. Kramer
,
ZHAO Shu-kun.Freedom and Legality Also on "Innate Connection between Legality and Ideal Freedom"[J].Seeking Truth,2012(1):68-76. |
| |
| Authors: | Matthew H Kramer ZHAO Shu-kun |
| |
| Institution: | Matthew H.Kramer(U.S.) Translated by ZHAO Shu-kun |
| |
| Abstract: | This article is about concept of passive freedom and clarifies passive freedom compared with active freedom,with republic freedom and the distinction between freedom of morality and justice and personal freedom;based on that,it analyzes the shortcoming of the concept of freedom of Nigel Simon and his flaw in the proposition of natural law which concerns the innate connection between law and ideal freedom. |
| |
| Keywords: | freedom as passive freedom active freedom republic freedom freedom of morality and justice and personal freedom freedom and legality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
