间性理论的原生态--从孟子的"以意逆志"说起

孟子提出说诗者面对诗作要"以意逆志",也就是解诗者要以意去迎取诗人之志。但孟子却没有明确论定说诗者所用之意,是说诗者之意,还是诗作者之意,这就留下了文本的未定点,引发了千古不绝的争论。本文以诗的文本作为不同主体间的经验世界的对象,认为对文本底蕴的把握,既要以诗人之意去迎取诗人之志,也要以解诗人之意去迎取诗人之志,并在作为对象存在的诗—世—志的多重文本间,达到对于文学文本的体验与认知。此中既有主体间性,又有文本间性。可见,"以意逆志"说中正含有间性理论的原生态的丰富存在。

The Original State of Inter-theory

Mencius put forward that those who were reading a poem should make the interpretation according to the meaning, but he did not definitely point out whether the meaning was that from the reader's or that from the poet's. So undetermined texts were left behind, which leads to the continuous arguments since the ancient times. This article takes the text of a poem as the object of the intersubjective world. And the author of this article thinks that to grasp the meaning of a text, the reader should make the interpretation according to not only the meaning of his but also that of the poet's, and at the same time the reader should manage to experience and cognize the literary text in a multi-layered text in which poems, world, and wills are the objectives. So both intersubjectivity and inter-featured text can be found here. In "interpreting a poem according to the meaning", there exists the original state of inter-theory.