首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事诉讼法个别条款的合宪性探析
引用本文:孙彩虹.刑事诉讼法个别条款的合宪性探析[J].河南社会科学,2003,11(6):71-73.
作者姓名:孙彩虹
作者单位:清华大学,法学院,北京,100084
摘    要:宪法被奉为“法律的法律”,普通法律应合乎宪法,依据宪法而定,以树立宪法的最高权威,这是建设社会主义法治国家的必经之路。但是刑事诉讼法个别条款的规定却违背了宪法的原则及其精神。我国宪法规定:人民法院独立行使审判权,而刑事诉讼法第七条却规定公检法机关要互相配合;宪法规定公民有言论自由,而刑事诉讼法第九十三条却规定犯罪嫌疑人对侦查人员的提问,应当如实回答。

关 键 词:刑事诉讼法  宪法  合宪性
文章编号:1007-905X(2003)06-0071-03
修稿时间:2003年8月23日

Discussions on constitutionality of individual clause of criminal procedure
Sun Caihong.Discussions on constitutionality of individual clause of criminal procedure[J].Henan Social Sciences,2003,11(6):71-73.
Authors:Sun Caihong
Abstract:Constitution is regarded as"the mother of the law".Any other laws should be consistent with the constitution so as to protect the supremacy of the constitution,which is a must to build the socialistic country of rule of law.However certain articles in the Criminal Procedure Code(CPC)are in conflict with the principles of the Constitution.The Constitution says that the courts exercise the judicial power exclusively.However the Article 7 of the CPC requires that the courts,the prosecuting attorney and public security organizations cooperate with each other.Also the Constitution provides the people enjoy the freedom of speech;however the article 93 of the CPC has the provision that the suspect should tell truth when inquired by the scout.
Keywords:code of criminal procedure  constitution  constitutionality
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号