| 章学诚方志思想的再认识 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 沈松平.章学诚方志思想的再认识[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2016,0(4):11-14. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 沈松平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (宁波大学 人文与传媒学院,浙江 宁波 315211) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 章学诚在方志学上的贡献，有口皆碑，但也有过誉之处。其方志思想除了因时代局限而包含的封建糟粕外，在认识上也存在着偏差，如史志不分，以史代志，追求极端的撰著体修志风格，误认为“前志传”系其首创，主张帝王后妃与正史立传人物不谮列于人物传，反对志书篇目因体现地方特色而升格等，在实践中则有与所持理论相悖之处。
|
| 关 键 词： | 章学诚 方志思想 史志不分 |
A New Understanding of Zhang Xuechengs Thoughts on Local Records |
| |
| SHEN Song-ping.A New Understanding of Zhang Xuechengs Thoughts on Local Records[J].Journal of Ningbo University(Liberal Arts Edition),2016,0(4):11-14. |
| |
| Authors: | SHEN Song-ping |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Faculty of Humanities Media, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Though Zhang Xuecheng was universally acknowledged for his contributions to the science of local records, his achievements on local record studies do not match his praises. To be frank, because of the constrains of time and place, there are some feudalism in his thoughts and some deviations in his cognition, i.e., treating history books as local records, replacing local records with history books, and his pursuing of an extreme “essay writing style”. He also mistakenly thought that he pioneered the “the biography of former local records”, and argued that emperor, empresses and people who had biographies in official history works should not be included in local records. He was against the idea of upgrading some chapters, even the chapters reflecting regional characteristics. But in practice, he did not fully follow his theory |
| |
| Keywords: | Zhang Xuecheng thoughts of local records confusion of history and local records |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》下载全文 |
