非合作博弈两阶段生产系统的环境效率评价

本文研究了环境效率评价中广泛存在的一类典型问题:两阶段非合作博弈的效率评价问题,该问题有两个明显的特点:(1)决策单元由经济生产子系统和污染物处理子系统两个阶段的子系统构成,(2)经济生产子系统产生的污染物由污染物处理子系统进行处理,且经济生产子系统居于主导地位,而污染物处理子系统居于从属地位.文章在分析各个决策单元整体效率与其子系统效率之间关系的基础上,提出一种能够同时评价决策单元整体效率和其子系统效率的DEA方法;然后引入非合作博弈思想,提出了基于两阶段非合作博弈的环境效率评价的DEA方法;最后采用中国各地区的工业系统的环境效率评价的实例分析说明了该方法的合理性和有效性.由于文章提出的方法能够有效地分析决策单元内部子系统的有效性水平,能够反映子系统之间的主从关系,能够发掘影响决策单元效率的关键因素,因而能够给出更为有效的环境管理信息,为决策者的决策提供科学的依据.     

A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs

We model the performance of DMUs (decision-making units) using a two-stage network model. In the first stage of production DMUs use inputs to produce an intermediate output that becomes an input to a second stage where final outputs are produced. Previous black box DEA models allowed for non-radial scaling of outputs and inputs and accounted for slacks in the constraints that define the technology. We extend these models and build a performance measure that accounts for a network structure of production. We use our method to estimate the performance of Japanese banks, which use labor, physical capital, and financial equity capital in a first stage to produce an intermediate output of deposits. In the second stage, those deposits become an input in the production of loans and securities investments. The network estimates reveal greater bank inefficiency than do the estimates that treat the bank production process as a black box with all production taking place in a single stage.     

存在非期望输入输出的多阶段系统效率评价模型

现有多阶段DEA模型的研究普遍假设所有输入、输出均为期望指标, 对存在非期望指标的情况研究较少, 尚无对最初投入和中间产出带有非期望指标的研究。为此, 本文首先提出了输入、输出类型的判定方法, 并将其应用于存在非期望输入、输出的两阶段系统。进一步针对存在非期望指标的两阶段生产系统中同种输入、输出, 尤其中间产出类型判定一致与不一致的情况, 构建了相应的生产可能集以及两阶段DEA模型, 最后利用本文方法和模型对我国上市银行效率进行了评价。     

Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric approach for measuring the relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs). Many studies have examined DEA efficiencies of two-stage systems, where all the outputs from the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. Although single-stage DEA models with undesirable input-outputs have been extensively studied, there still lacks of more systematical investigation on two-stage DEA with undesirable variables. For instance, depending on its operating model, even whether an intermediate variable is desirable or undesirable can be questionable for a particular two-stage system. Furthermore, most of the existing studies on two-stage systems focus on the case where only the final outputs are undesirable. In this work, we try to systematically examine two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Particularly, we utilize the free-disposal axioms to construct the production possibility sets (PPS) and the corresponding DEA models with undesirable variables. The proposed models are then used to illustrate some theoretical perspectives by using the data of China׳s listed banks.     

DEA models for extended two-stage network structures

Liang et al. (2008) [1] developed DEA models based upon game approach to decompose efficiency for two-stage network structures where all outputs of the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. This paper extends Liang et al. (2008) [1] by assuming that the inputs to the second stage include both the outputs from the first stage and additional inputs to the second stage. Two models are proposed to evaluate the performance of this type general two-stage network structures. One is a non-linear centralized model whose global optimal solutions can be estimated using a heuristic search procedure. The other is a non-cooperative model, in which one of the stages is regarded as the leader and the other is the follower. The newly developed models are applied to a case of regional R&D of China.     

基于自由处置性的网络系统效率评价模型研究

网络系统生产可能集是构建网络DEA模型的基础,而相邻生产子过程的投入产出连接条件则是构造生产可能集的关键。现有的网络DEA模型在本质上都假设所有子过程的投入产出都满足强自由处置性,然而在实际生产管理活动中,这一假设未必成立。本文从各类自由处置公理出发,系统地研究了各种类型的子过程投入产出连接条件,构建了一般网络系统的生产可能集,给出了相应的等价形式,并构建了相应的网络DEA模型用于评价决策单元的效率。最后利用本文提出的方法和模型对我国上市银行的效率进行了评价。本文的研究对于一般网络系统的绩效评价和改进具有重要的意义。     

部分中间产出作为最终产品的两阶段合作效率

网络DEA模型研究多个进程和多个子系统的复杂系统的效率度量.针对中间产出无法为第2阶段完全消耗的情形,传统DEA模型对系统效率的评价偏高,已有网络DEA模型则对系统效率的评价偏低.本文提出部分中间产出作为最终产品,进入流通渠道的两阶段效率模型,用来测度两阶段生产过程的真实效率.采用乘积形式描述两阶段合作的特征,给出不同...     

Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern

In a two-stage system with two divisions connected in series, fairly setting the target outputs for the first stage or equivalently the target inputs for the second stage is critical, in order to ensure that the two stages have incentives to collaborate with each other to achieve the best performance of the whole system. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) as a non-parametric approach for efficiency evaluation of multi-input, multi-output systems has drawn a lot of attention. Recently, many two-stage DEA models were developed for studying the internal structures of two-stage systems. However, there was no work studying fair setting of the target intermediate products (or intermediate measures) although unreasonable setting will result in unfairness to the two stages because setting higher (fewer) intermediate measures means that the first (second) stage must make more efforts to achieve the overall production plan. In this paper, a new DEA model taking account of fairness in the setting of the intermediate products is proposed, where the fairness is interpreted based on Nash bargaining game model, in which the two stages negotiate their target efficiencies in the two-stage system based on their individual efficiencies. This approach is illustrated by an empirical application to insurance companies.     

Internal resource waste and centralization degree in two-stage systems: An efficiency analysis

Internal resource waste refers to the waste in the intermediate resources between the upstream stage and downstream stage in a production or service system. This study examines a system with a two-stage structure, in which the outputs from the first stage are taken as the inputs for the second stage. Two-stage systems can exist in centralized, decentralized, or mixed organizational modes. In this paper, we propose two-stage DEA models considering a degree of centralization that makes it possible to measure internal resource waste in different system modes. Some managerial insights are tested and verified from the perspective of efficiency analysis. We find that: 1) when there is only one intermediate measure in a centralized two-stage system, internal resource waste can be eliminated completely, and 2) a higher degree of centralization in a two-stage system can lead to less internal resource waste and more expected outputs. Finally, we present a numerical example and two practical real-world examples that illustrate our approach and findings.     

多层次结构DEA模型及其应用

在评价实践中,评价者通常倾向采用一组指标或指标体系对DMUs展开相对全面的评价,不同层次指标的重要性也往往不同。然而,标准DEA模型在DMUs有限条件下经常会面临无法直接处理过多的评价指标,也无法直接处理多层次指标的问题。本文从DEA模型中的序结构和测度出发,构建了符合多层次指标体系特点,能相对全面地体现评价者价值导向,且具有合理区分能力的多层次结构DEA模型,并以15个机构基础研究的投入-产出评价为例展开了应用分析。     

Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model

In this paper, we address several issues related to the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA). These issues include model orientation, input and output selection/definition, the use of mixed and raw data, and the number of inputs and outputs to use versus the number of decision making units (DMUs). We believe that within the DEA community, researchers, practitioners, and reviewers may have concerns and, in many cases, incorrect views about these issues. Some of the concerns stem from what is perceived as being the purpose of the DEA exercise. While the DEA frontier can rightly be viewed as a production frontier, it must be remembered that ultimately DEA is a method for performance evaluation and benchmarking against best-practice. DEA can be viewed as a tool for multiple-criteria evaluation problems where DMUs are alternatives and each DMU is represented by its performance in multiple criteria which are coined/classified as DEA inputs and outputs. The purpose of this paper is to offer some clarification and direction on these matters.     

Multi-valued measures in DEA in the presence of undesirable outputs

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) evaluates the relative efficiency of a set of comparable decision making units (DMUs) with multiple performance measures (inputs and outputs). Classical DEA models rely on the assumption that each DMU can improve its performance by increasing its current output level and decreasing its current input levels. However, undesirable outputs (like wastes and pollutants) may often be produced together with desirable outputs in final products which have to be minimized. On the other hands, in some real-world situations, we may encounter some specific performance measures with more than one value which are measured by various standards. In this study, we referee such measures as multi-valued measures which only one of their values should be selected. For instance, unemployment rate is a multi-valued measure in economic applications since there are several definitions or standards to measure it. As a result, selecting a suitable value for a multi-valued measure is a challenging issue and is crucial for successful application of DEA. The aim of this study is to accommodate multi-valued measures in the presence of undesirable outputs. In doing so, we formulate two individual and summative selecting directional distance models and develop a pair of multiplier- and envelopment-based selecting approaches. Finally, we elaborate applicability of the proposed method using a real data on 183 NUTS 2 regions in 23 selected EU-28 countries.     

存在保证域的模糊非径向偏好DEA模型——基于中科院24个研究所的实证分析

数据包络分析（DEA）是一种非参数化的方法,用于评价具有类似输入和输出的决策单元的效率。传统的非径向DEA模型假设输入和输出数据均为准确值,且对权重变量不加以限制,本文构建了存在保证域的模糊非径向偏好DEA模型,并给出了一种基于模糊数截集的模型求解方法,有效地解决了输入和输出全部或部分为模糊数的决策单元评价问题。最后给出了一个中科院研究所效率评价的实例说明了方法的有效性。     

基于DEA的两阶段系统中间产品公平设定研究

在由两个子决策单元串联组成的两阶段系统中,公平设定中间产品目标对确保和激励两阶段相互合作以达到整个系统的最佳性能至关重要.数据包络分析(DEA)作为系统绩效评估的一种非参数方法吸引了众多学者的注意;基于此方法,本文提出一个考虑公平关切的两阶段DEA模型用于设定两阶段系统中间产品目标,并证明据此模型获得的设定方案正是一个纳什讨价还价博弈的均衡解.     

Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective

Benchmarking airports is currently popular both in the academic literature and in practice but has proved rather problematic due to the heterogeneity inherent in any reasonably sized dataset. Most studies either treat the airport production technology as a black box, or separate the terminal and airside activities, assessing them individually. In this article we analyze airports as a single unit due to the direct complementarities, thus avoiding the artificial separation of inputs. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA), we open the black box in which a network describes the production process, thus demonstrating the sequential effects that separate final from intermediate outputs, including those under partial managerial control and those that are known to be non-discretionary. To further improve the benchmarking process, we identify appropriate peers for a case study of 43 European airports over 10 years, through a restricted reference mechanism according to pre-defined characteristics. Compared to basic DEA models, the results of the proposed structure provide more meaningful benchmarks with comparable peer units and target values that are potentially achievable in the medium term. By identifying each unit's individual reference set, unique outliers influence the performance measurement less severely than occurs under basic DEA. In addition, the formulations produce an implementation path that moves the airport towards the Pareto frontier gradually, taking into account the regulatory and business environment in which the unit is located.     

Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China

In real world situations, there is a hierarchical structure exists in a specific organization and each component has its network process. However, such hierarchical network system has not been well studied in previous literature, and misleading results often are produced. The current paper discusses a data envelopment analysis (DEA) modelling technique for a network structure where a hierarchical system consists of components having two-stage series processes. An additive network DEA is proposed to evaluate the performance of this type of network structure. The overall and divisional efficiencies of the system and each component can be derived, and the relationship between system efficiency, divisional efficiency and the ones of components is discussed. The newly developed additive network DEA is nonlinear and cannot be converted into a linear program. A semidefinite programming (SDP) approach is developed for effectively solving this model and the global solution can be guaranteed. Another linear multiplicative network DEA also developed for this hierarchical system. The two newly developed models are illustrated with a case of the performance evaluation of high-technology industry in China.     

两阶段DEA前沿面投影问题研究——兼对我国上市银行运营绩效进行评价

DEA方法,即数据包络分析方法,是一种用于评价决策单元(Decision Making Units,DMUs)相对有效性的实证方法。近年来DEA方法已经广泛的应用于各行各业的绩效评价中,并发展出两阶段DEA方法。两阶段DEA方法相对于传统DEA方法的优势在于,它不但可以提供被评价对象的总体效率值,还可以分别生成每一阶段的效率值。但正是由于中间要素的存在,按照传统的DEA方法来调整两阶段DEA投入、产出要素的优化过程已不能成功投影在有效前沿面上。本文基于两阶段DEA方法,通过加入"虚拟中间要素"在两阶段DEA中嵌入一个"虚拟阶段",这样不但完善了两阶段DEA的逻辑结构,而且成功的将被评价单元投影到有效前沿面。最后本文应用以上方法对我国上市银行的运营绩效进行了实证分析。实证结果令我们意外的是,国有商业银行运营绩效优于股份制银行。     

Stochastic efficiency analysis with a reliability consideration

Stochastic Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models have been introduced in the literature to assess the performance of operating entities with random input and output data. A stochastic DEA model with a reliability constraint is proposed in this study that maximizes the lower bound of an entity׳s efficiency score with some pre-selected probability. We define the concept of stochastic efficiency and develop a solution procedure. The economic interpretations of the stochastic efficiency index are presented when the inputs and outputs of each entity follow a multivariate joint normal distribution.     

Ranking efficient units in DEA

Super-efficiency data envelopment analysis (DEA) model can be used in ranking the performance of efficient decision making units (DMUs). Because of the infeasibility problem associated with the super-efficiency DEA model, ranking has been restricted to the model where constant returns to scale and proportional changes in all inputs or all outputs are assumed. In fact, when super-efficiency is used as an efficiency stability measure, infeasibility means the highest super-efficiency. However, if super-efficiency is interpreted as input saving or output surplus achieved by a specific efficient DMU, infeasibility does not necessarily mean the highest super-efficiency. In order to obtain a complete ranking of efficient DMUs when the two assumptions are relaxed, a modified super-efficiency DEA model is proposed to overcome the infeasibility problem and to correctly capture the super-efficiency represented by the input saving or the output surplus. The current paper suggests using both input- and output-oriented super-efficiency models to characterize the super-efficiency when infeasibility occurs. As a result, we can rank the efficient DMUs if infeasibility occurs. The approach is applied to 20 largest Japanese companies and 15 US cities, respectively.     

Stage efficiency evaluation in a two-stage network data envelopment analysis model with weight priority

Conventional DEA models treat the entire production system as a black box and ignore its internal structures. To address this issue, many studies have examined the DEA efficiencies of two-stage systems in which all outputs of the first stage are the only inputs to the second stage. Based on game theory, the non-cooperative model and centralized model were developed for such a two-stage network structure. However, for the centralized model with multiple optimal solutions and the non-cooperative model, an assumption is required as to whether the first or second stage should be assigned the absolute priority for optimization. In many cases, certain circumstances might exist in which one stage does not completely dominate the other stage. In this paper, we develop a methodology for assessing the overall and stage efficiencies by considering the different and DMU-specific degree of priority given to the stages. Particularly, the non-cooperative model and the centralized model can be deemed as special cases. Moreover, we compare the proposed approaches with the existing approaches, which indicates that our approaches can greatly reduce the computational burden. Two empirical examples are used to demonstrate the proposed approach.