以系统思维推进上海城市创新治理能力现代化

针对当前上海创新治理中存在的"部门分割、条块分离、要素分散"等问题,进一步推进创新治理体系和治理能力现代化,应以系统思维统领创新治理能力现代化建设的全局,基于创新链、服务链、要素链,明晰政府管理部门的定位和界面,找准政府部门参与创新治理的抓手和载体,积极进行管理、服务要素的组合创新,以实现创新效率的整体提升.     

加快实现从科技管理向创新治理转变

创新趋势和现实需求要求科技管理向创新治理转变,转变的思路和内容是:从以控制为中心的管理理念向以协调为中心的治理理念转变,从政府作为唯一的管理者向多元化主体共同参与治理转变,从管理科技向治理创新转变,从计划管理和政策管理为主向多手段治理转变。转变的具体对策包括:建立权威的创新治理机构、培育多元化的治理主体、完善创新治理规则、提高创新治理能力和水平等。     

国家科技创新治理体系与上海对策总体研究

在加快建设全球科技创新中心的大背景之下,上海需从世界竞争大格局、适应经济发展新常态、区域创新辐射等维度统筹设计和思考定位,重点从正确处理政府与市场以及社会的关系、有效促进各类创新主体协同互动、改进科技创新治理机制、完善激励大众创业万众创新的制度环境等方面,推进其科技创新治理体系现代化,促进支撑科技创新发展的制度基础更加成熟定型,促进创新要素的高效聚集和有效流动,激发创新动力和活力,提高科技创新的质量和效率.     

“十三五”期间提升上海城市创新能力的战略举措

实施创新驱动发展战略是一个系统工程。上海要加快制定创新驱动发展战略的顶层设计,改革创新战略规划和资源配置体制机制,深化产学研合作,加强制度创新、管理创新、科技创新、文化创新等创新子系统的统筹协调,加快建立健全各主体、各方面、各环节有机互动、协同高效的创新体系。     

上海建设具有全球影响力科技创新中心战略研究

未来一个时期,上海要全面贯彻落实习近平总书记提出的“加快向具有全球影响力的科技创新中心进军”新定位、新要求,牢牢把握科技进步大方向、产业革命大趋势、集聚人才大举措,立足国家战略,大力实施创新驱动发展战略,围绕“由谁来创新”“动力哪里来”“成果如何用”3个基本问题,充分发挥市场在配置科技资源中的决定性作用,聚焦科技前瞻布局,聚焦体制机制创新,聚焦创新生态优化,聚焦新兴产业培育,聚焦人才激励机制,努力促进创新要素高度集聚、创新活力竞相迸发、创新成果持续涌现,推动城市核心竞争力不断提升,为实现中华民族伟大复兴中国梦作出应有贡献.     

上海研发与转化功能型平台建设现状、问题及对策

研发与转化功能型平台建设,是上海实施创新驱动发展战略、加快培育新经济、塑造发展新动能、提升科创中心集中度和显示度的重要举措.上海应从增强科技创新策源能力出发,聚焦功能性平台建设,加强分类管理、分阶段管理和促进供需对接,从体制机制、平台自身、对外科技服务等层面推进研发与转化功能型平台建设.     

上海提升企业自主创新能力的障碍与对策

提升企业自主创新能力,更好发挥企业创新主体作用,是新形势下适应"双循环"新发展格局、深入实施创新驱动发展战略、强化国家战略科技力量、实现科技自立自强的关键所在.上海进一步提升企业自主创新能力,需要积极培育具有全球影响力的创新型领军企业,支持组建新型创新联合体,大力弘扬企业家精神和科学家精神,建设高层次创新人才队伍,打造富有韧性的创新生态系统.     

上海加快构建产业技术创新体系研究

加快构建产业技术创新体系是上海实现创新转型的重大战略。上海产业技术创新体系建设必须紧密对接国家战略性新兴产业发展战略与规划，立足国际视野抢抓重大技术机遇；坚持发挥上海产业、金融、科技、人才等综合优势，坚持聚焦战略性新兴产业重点产业领域、重大项目以及新增长点的培育形成；推动产业技术来源向自主创新、引进创新、消化吸收再创新、集成创新等多源并举转变，推动产业技术形态向产品创新、工艺创新、设备创新、材料创新、服务创新多环节整合转变，推动产业技术创新重点领域向制造领域和商业模式双轮并举转变。     

上海加快建设全球科技创新中心的若干思考

加快建设全球科技创新中心是上海建设"四个中心"的应有之义,也是履行"科学发展先行者、改革开放排头兵"历史使命的必然要求。上海建设全球科技创新中心已有较好基础,但也面临严峻挑战和制约。上海可在完善规划、创新资源、成果转化、支撑体系、创新文化和合作网络等方面采取更有针对性的措施,进一步提升科技创新的核心竞争力和全球影响力。     

上海“十二五”科技发展的战略研究

一、上海“十一五”科技发展的主要成就“十一五”以来上海科技发展成效显著，综合实力大幅提升，自主创新能力、支撑经济社会发展能力、引领未来发展能力和服务国家创新战略能力明显增强，为实现要素驱动、投资驱动向创新驱动转变奠定了坚实的基础。     

Where to Go,What to Do During Visit to China s Capital

If you are coming to,or are in,Beijing for the first time,you probably know about the things you must do:Visit the Forbidden City and Tian'anmen Square,enjoy a meal at the famous Quanjude Roast Duck Restaurant,and spend a day trekking on the Great Wall.In addition to those must-experience activities, Women of China offers readers its editors' picks,which are a few recommendations on where to eat and places to visit while in the city.     

“放虎归山“的女人

全莉,一个属虎的、完完全全的“圈外人”,凭着热情,在争议当中开始了她“放虎归山”的个人试验。而验证她的,只能是时间。     

Understanding sex: the right to legal capacity to consent to sex

This article addresses the right to legal capacity to consent to sex of people with intellectual disabilities. Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities guarantees the right to legal capacity on an equal basis in all areas of life. This article discusses sex as an area of life in which people with intellectual disabilities are frequently not being granted legal capacity on an equal basis. The article examines current capacity to consent to sex law in Ireland, England and Wales in light of Article 12. It proposes an ‘agreement model’ as a potential alternative that would be Article 12 compliant.     

Invitation to Research: Invitation to Learn

This article analyzes the process of acquiring informed consent from parents of economically disadvantaged children 7 to 12 years of age at a Boys &; Girls Club in a Midwest city. The article addresses the following question: What are the obstacles in mainstream research to including children’s voluntary participation in research that intends to benefit their lives? The lessons gained from requesting an invitation into the lives of poor children through informed-consent processes inform future social work research methods.     

香港引导青少年健康上网举措析评

网络可以帮助青少年增广见闻、培育心智,但如果被鼠标控制,青少年也可能成为网络低俗文化的最大受害者。因此,在青少年分辨是非能力未成熟的情况下,引导他们健康上网,学会控制鼠标,做网络的主人,对青少年的身心健康成长极为重要。本文以为可进行优秀网站选举,实行优秀网站学生大使计划,推行互联网内容标签制度,成立沉溺上网支援中心,都是近年来香港引导青少年健康上网的主要举措。     

Barriers to migrant entry to occupations in Australia

In 1986, 21.3% of the population of Australia had been born overseas; currently, foreign born workers comprise 25% of the labor force. The level of skilled immigration has continued to increase throughout the 1980s. In the past, most English-speaking migrants gained recognition of their overseas qualifications, but about half of those from non-English speaking countries have never been able to return to their pre-migration occupations. Beginning with the medical field, occupational regulating gradually grew with state autonomy being a marked feature. Australia has 1 of the most highly regulated labor markets in the world, with hundreds of bodies to determine entry criteria. The Council of Overseas Professional Qualifications, established in 1969, guides selection and tests professionals both overseas and already resident in Australia. The Tradesmen's Rights Regulation Act recognizes acceptable tradesmen. Aside from these 2 bodies, the majority of qualifications are assessed at the state or local level. Problems skilled immigrants have encountered in attempting to gain recognition of their overseas qualifications include 1) preference for locally trained workers or discrimination against non-British/non-Australian qualifications; 2) lack of adequate information about assessment procedures; 3) inadequate use of interpreting and translating services; 4) language difficulties in tests; and 5) frequent assessment only on formal qualifications, with skills and experience not being evaluated. The 2 basic models for assessing occupational suitability are the valuation of qualifications approach and the valuation of skills approach. To illustrate the operation of various models of assessment, the author discusses these occupations: medicine, nursing, engineering, computing, and electrical trades. The major factors that are essential for an overall strategy of change include 1) less occupational regulation in the labor market; 2) national registration and licensing systems in the "life-threatening" or "critical" occupations; 3) optional certification systems preferably at the national level, in the noncritical occupations; 4) skills-based assessments; 5) mainstreaming of all assessment mechanisms into authorized accrediting and assessing agencies; and 6) flexible means of entry to occupations. The establishment of an appropriate mechanism and legislation for achieving this change is of paramount importance.